Old-style incandescent light bulbs turn 95 percent of the electricity they consume into heat. Only 5 percent is turned into light. With compact fluorescents (CFLs) the figures are about 80 percent heat and 20 percent light. That’s a big difference. So replacing old-style bulbs with CFLs is worthwhile – especially for lights that burn for a long time.

For our test, we wanted to see how the energy-saver bulbs compared with standard bulbs for light output, and how long they lasted after being switched on and off continually. Most of the bulbs we tested were CFLs – the best of them had a much higher light output (were much brighter) than the equivalent standard bulb and had a long life as well.

About our test

Lighting test

Our lighting test in action

We wanted to see if the CFLs and the halogens were as “bright” as the bulbs they replaced. So we put two samples of 17 CFLs into a special test rig and compared the total light output of each model with the average of the light outputs of seven different 100W incandescent bulbs. We then used a similar process for two energy-saver halogens (the difference being that their light output was compared with the average of two different 60W incandescents).

We also put three samples of all 19 bulbs (CFLs and halogens) into a special rig which switched the bulbs on for five minutes and off for five minutes 10,000 times. The bulbs were continuously monitored so we could tell if and when they failed.
 

For details of how all the bulbs performed, see the Test results.

 

Join Consumer now and make your decisions easy on a huge range of products and services

  • Over 500 reports, plus interactive tools and calculators
  • Independent advice from NZ's trusted source of information
  • Join over 65,000 members who help us get all NZers a fairer deal

from just $25

Join now
Read what our members say