world map on apple

Country of origin labelling

We’re campaigning for country of origin labelling (CoOL) because we think consumers have the right to know where their food comes from.

×

Choose what’s right for you with confidence

Join today and get instant access to all test results and research.

What’s happening?

The Consumers’ Right to Know (Country of Origin of Food) Bill was introduced into parliament in 2017.

The bill proposed mandatory country of origin labelling of fruit and vege, as well as other single component foods. We supported this bill.

But in July 2018, the Primary Production Select Committee released its interim report on the bill, recommending country of origin labelling be restricted to just fresh or frozen fruit, vegetables, meat and seafood!

These changes significantly weaken the original bill and fail to recognise the strong consumer support for labelling.

We’ll be making a submission to the select committee, letting it know we don’t support the changes it’s proposed.

How you can help

The closing date for submissions is 1 August 2018. We’re encouraging consumers to have their say on the bill.

You can make a submission online here.

Why we support labelling

Our 2017 survey with Horticulture New Zealand found 71% of New Zealanders want mandatory country of origin labelling for fruit and vegetables. Only 9% were opposed.

Survey results also confirm the existing voluntary approach to labelling isn’t giving consumers the facts they need to make informed choices.

Sixty-five percent of shoppers said they looked for labelling information when they bought fresh fruit. But less than a third (32%) always found it. Even fewer (29%) always found the information when they bought fresh veges.

Country of origin labelling is already mandatory in many other countries. At least 50 countries, including Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States, have mandatory labelling requirements.

CoOL FAQs

With the exception of wine, New Zealand law doesn’t require the country of origin of food and drinks to be disclosed to shoppers.

In 2005, the government opted out of joining Australia in mandating CoOL under the Food Standards Code on the grounds it would be an impediment to trade. The government and some big export players in the dairy and meat industry argued a voluntary system was a better option. But many of the countries we trade with require CoOL.

Our latest survey shows the voluntary system isn’t working for consumers. Shoppers have a poor experience when they want to find out where their food comes from. A voluntary system also means there’s no independent monitoring or enforcement.

When labels are provided, the information can be meaningless. When we checked country of origin statements on 81 packets of frozen berries and veges, 21% had vague statements they were “made or packed in New Zealand from local and/or imported ingredients” or “packed in New Zealand from imported ingredients”.

Manufacturers claim they’ll need tracking systems and label changes will increase costs to consumers. But they should already have systems to track where their products come from. Manufacturers often change packaging for marketing promotions — and many countries they export to demand CoOL — so we don’t buy the cost argument.

We believe consumers have a right to know where their food comes from so they can make informed choices. Our survey shows many consumers want to buy local produce. Some also want to reduce the food miles on the food they eat and avoid certain countries for ethical reasons such as workers’ rights.

The government has argued labelling is not a food safety issue because border controls already provide protection from unsafe products. But border controls aren’t foolproof. Venomous spiders found in imported Mexican grapes are one example.

Survey results

70% agreed or strongly agreed buying NZ-grown fruit and veges is important to them. A slightly higher proportion (72%) agreed it’s important for them to know where their fruit and veges come from and that country of origin labelling is important to them.


Consumers are more likely to look for country of origin information when buying fresh fruit and veges. Specifically, 65% look for country of origin information when buying fresh fruit and 60% do so when buying fresh veges.


Of those who look for country of origin information when buying fresh fruit, less than a third said they always find it; even fewer (29%) said they always find this information when buying fresh veges.


Five out of 7 Kiwis think it should be mandatory for fruit and vegetable retailers to display country of origin information. Regular buyers of fresh fruit and veges are more likely to share this opinion.


GUIDE TO THE GRAPHS OUR DATA are from a nationally representative survey of 1066 New Zealanders, aged 18 years and older, and carried out online in February 2017. Figures may add to +/- 100% due to rounding. The margin of error is +/- 3.0%.

Donate promo default

Make a donation

To help us get a fair deal for all New Zealanders, you can make a donation or bequest. We’ll use your contribution to investigate consumer issues and work for positive change.

Donate to the Consumer Foundation