We look at the cover provided by EQC and insurance companies in the event of a natural disaster. Find out what's covered, what's excluded, and the specific cover available for landlords and tenants.
Join today and get instant access to all test results and research.
The cost to insurers of the two Christchurch earthquakes will make them this country’s largest insurance events. Private insurers don’t pick up the total bill because a government agency called the Earthquake Commission (EQC) pays the first part of any claim caused by an earthquake or natural disaster.
The EQC insures domestic houses (including flats and holiday homes), personal belongings and the land houses are built on against damage from earthquakes, natural landslips, volcanic eruption, hydrothermal activity, tsunamis and any storms or floods or fire caused by these.
But to get the EQC payment you must have house and/or contents insurance. If you have this type of policy, you pay an EQC levy as part of your premiums that automatically covers you up to $100,000 plus GST for damage to your home and $20,000 plus GST for damage to your contents.
Your private insurance policy will have to cover the cost of damage above these caps.
What doesn’t EQC cover? Commercial and business premises are excluded. It also doesn’t provide cover for temporary accommodation for your family and pets, loss of rent if your rental home is not safe for your tenants to live in, and certain personal belongings including those used for business purposes. Some of the belongings not covered by EQC include motor vehicles, trailers, boats, jewellery, art, securities and documents.
This is when you need to look to your insurer. Most companies cover these belongings in their policies, but insuring business equipment usually requires a separate policy or buying an additional benefit on your existing house and contents policy.
Most of the insurance policies we looked at offer cover for temporary accommodation for both you and your pets and include storage and moving your contents.
The Queensland flood victims discovered the hard way to check the fine print in their insurance policies.
According to the Insurance Council of Australia floods come under 3 common definitions: flash flooding or storm-water damage, riverine flooding caused by overflowing rivers, and actions of the sea. Several insurance companies didn’t cover flooding from rivers in their standard policies. So many Queenslanders were either not covered, or left waiting a month for a definition of the flood type. Companies were also not prepared to offer flood protection in areas that had been subject to floods.
We checked with local insurers about flood cover. IAG New Zealand, which underwrites a number of policies in our house and contents insurance survey, said “flood cover is usually provided under cover related to natural disasters – but excesses or restrictions may be applied depending on risk factors, such as living in a flood zone.”
Tip: Check your policy carefully to see whether there are any restrictions because of the risks from flooding or other known natural disasters in your area.
There have been complaints from people in earthquake-damaged homes about being charged full insurance premiums. Insurers told us people must continue paying their premiums because their policy covers not just the house but also damage to sheds, garages, retaining walls, and fences. It also covers any future liability such as your fence falling into your neighbour’s property some months after an earthquake and damaging their deck.
Several companies have responded to this issue by reducing their premiums for customers with damaged homes (excluding the EQC and fire service levies). IAG is one insurer that’s offering a 25 to 50 percent discount depending on whether you can live in the damaged house or not. Westpac is offering a 75 percent discount. Tower offers customers the option of cancelling their insurance and paying no further premiums if their house is earmarked for demolition.
Check with your insurer about whether they’re offering a discount if your house has been substantially damaged by the earthquakes.
Getting new insurance cover in the Canterbury region is tricky. Most companies have restrictions on new customers signing up for house and/or contents insurance in the Canterbury region (including those with newly built houses to move into).
However, if you purchase a house which is insured by a particular company, the company may continue the cover for the new owners. A spokesperson for ASB (whose insurance policies are underwritten by IAG) said "the availability of new cover will depend on whether or not the property for which cover is being sought is damaged, where the property is located, and whether the house and contents are already insured by IAG."
Restricted areas vary by company – AMI, for example, includes Canterbury, South Canterbury and the West Coast in its restricted zone, while Tower's only extends as far as Ashburton and Cheviot. Insurers are constantly monitoring what’s going on and may change their definition of a restricted area at any time.
Report by Scott Donaldson.
Our members have had mixed experiences dealing with EQC and insurance companies over claims from the first Christchurch earthquake.
Deborah and her family had to wait three months before EQC assessors could assess their no longer weatherproof home – two chimneys had fallen through the upstairs’ ceilings. They received a full payout from EQC promptly and have been very happy with the service from their insurer, State Insurance. The only problem was being on the waiting list for a construction company to carry out the more than $200,000 in repairs. This was before the second earthquake. Deborah did comment that there seemed to be a lack of communication about procedures between EQC and “ground-level” staff at State.
Veronica and her husband had power of attorney over their son’s house in Christchurch while he was overseas. Another son was renting the house with two other tenants (who moved out just before the first earthquake struck on September 4 last year).
For the next two months it was a merry-go-round between EQC and State Insurance. State had the building assessed and was waiting on the assessor’s report before deciding whether to pay out on its landlords’ policy over the house. The assessor had said when assessing the property that no final decision would be made until EQC had assessed the building. EQC then told Veronica that her son’s house was not a priority and it could be months or even a year before it was assessed by EQC. Its view was that State’s own assessors’ report was sufficient for State to pay out under its policy.
That’s what happened. State agreed to pay out to cover the loss of rent from the two tenants based on its assessor’s report. Veronica is now much happier with her insurer: “fair play to State for coming to the party in the finish”.