Home, heating & renovation

Product overview

Welcome to New Zealand’s trusted, independent source of practical consumer information. Join us now to access all our information and Consumer advisers when you need them.  

Shower heads

10jul shower heads hero default

Cut your hot-water bill with a low-flow shower head.

Our user trial of low-flow mains-pressure shower heads found 3 that came close to the perfect combination of comfort and effectiveness.

From our test


Choose what’s right for you with confidence

Join today and get instant access to all test results and research.

About our trial

Over 9 days we got 8 people to assess our low-flow shower heads for the best combination of comfort (felt good) and effectiveness (got them clean) without heating up the power bill.

At the end of the 9 days we had 8 squeaky-clean people – and a pile of wet towels!

All the models were mains-pressure shower heads. (See 'Pressure and flow' for more about mains pressure.)

The trial was conducted in the same shower cubicle using the same mixer-control and slide-rail each time. The shower head and hose were changed every day.

To make changing the heads easy, we selected hand-held shower heads with a flexible hose. The shower heads could also be clipped into either a wall bracket or on to a slide-rail. Many of the models can be bought as fixed heads.

Tip: The Aquatica Eco Smarte and Eco-Stream are identical. They’re marketed under two names and sold by different retailers. The Mitre 10 Eco-Stream version was significantly cheaper.

We measured the mains water pressure and then the water flow for each head. The Aquatica/Eco-Stream and Feltonmix heads could be configured as high- or low-flow by fitting the supplied flow restrictor into the handle. We tried them in both configurations.

What we found

What our triallists thought of the comfort and effectiveness of the shower heads.


We asked our triallists how much they liked the feel of the shower on their hair and body and asked them to choose descriptive words for the feel of the spray. Most people who liked the feel of the shower on their body also liked it on their hair.

  • The Aquatica/Eco-Stream (low-flow setting) was rated highest overall for comfort. All our triallists “liked it a lot” or rated it “OK”. One summed it up as: “Enjoyed the shower: wide range of easy-to-use settings.”
  • The Englefield was rated next-most comfortable – everyone “liked it a lot" or rated it “OK”. One summary comment was: “Liked this one. Hope it’s eco-friendly.”
  • Least liked was the Feltonmix (high-flow setting). Half the triallists described the shower as “hard” or “needle-like”. One comment was: “This shower head is just not pleasant at this high flow rate.”


We asked our triallists how effective each shower head was at wetting their hair and body – and how well it showered water over their bodies. We also asked them how effective it was at removing shampoo from their hair and soap or body wash from their bodies.

  • The Methven and Aquatica/Eco-Stream (high-flow setting) were rated the most effective heads. They both received positive ratings (“very effective”, “fairly effective”, or “OK”) from all triallists and no negative comments.
  • Next most effective was the Englefield. It had slightly fewer positive comments – but no negative ones.
  • Least effective was the Foreno.

Compare all the shower heads in our test.