Our test was based on the UL217 standard for smoke alarms.
Overall score is based on smouldering and flaming fire sensitivity.
How we test
Multiple alarms were placed in our “smoke-sensitivity chamber”. Smoke was introduced from a “smoke box”, which contained the burning or smouldering source, so the level of smoke increased steadily until the alarm was triggered.
We generated smoke from flaming wood, flaming oil, smouldering wood chips, and smouldering upholstery foam. We also used burning toast and a frying hamburger pattie to see how the alarms responded to “nuisance alarm” sources.
We tested three samples of each alarm with each smoke source.
Our results show how the alarms responded compared to control sensors in the chamber for flaming and smouldering smoke sources. A “Good” or “OK” response meant the alarm sounded quickly enough to alert you to danger. Alarms with a “Poor” response took significantly longer to sound, while “Extreme” sensitivity meant the alarm sounded so quickly they are more likely to issue false alarms.
Ease of use
We also assessed the quality of the supplied instructions and how easy an alarm was to install. This doesn’t contribute to our overall score.
Why is this free?
This report is free thanks to funding from Tenancy Services.
Consumer NZ is non-profit. To help us get a fairer deal for all New Zealand consumers you can become a Consumer member or make a donation. We’ll use your contribution to investigate consumer issues and work for positive change.