The Act states that goods must be of “acceptable quality.” Acceptable quality in this situation clearly means a new, reliable machine. You can ask the shop to repair the mower so it starts as it should.
If they are unable to do so within a reasonable time, or refuse to do so, you can ask for a replacement new mower without the fault, or get a refund. A refund under the Act means exactly that – a full cash refund – not a credit note, and not a refund less deductions for anything related to the failure of the goods.
Yes. Free gifts are covered, as are household goods that are hired, rented, leased or bought on hire purchase.
No. The supplier is illegally attempting to contract out of the Act. If you find a defect in the jeans after you buy them, you have the right to return them and ask that they be repaired. If the supplier refuses or cannot repair them in a reasonable time, you can ask for a replacement pair or a refund.
The same applies to “seconds” (goods sold as damaged). However, you cannot complain about the defect that made the product a “second” in the first place, if you were told about that defect prior to buying it.
To “contract out” is where a supplier says the Act does not apply to the goods or services they are selling.
Suppliers are not allowed to contract out when supplying goods or services to a consumer. They are allowed to when supplying customers who are in trade.
Contracting out must be done in writing.
There are 2 issues here. First, gifts are covered by the Act just as if you have bought them yourself (you may need proof of purchase, of course).
Second, a claim under the Act must be made within a “reasonable time”, which is defined as the period from when you obtained the goods to the point in time when it would be reasonable to expect the defect to become apparent.
Factors considered in deciding this period include the type of goods, their normal use, how long they usually last and how much they have been used.
You could probably expect a microwave to last 10 years under normal conditions. In this example, the microwave has never been used and would be covered by the Act - unless you have contributed to the problem yourself. For example, if the microwave doesn’t work because it has been damaged by damp, then the supplier would be able to argue that you are no longer covered by the Act.
Unfortunately there is nothing in the CGA to help you in this situation. The law doesn’t give you a right to a continuous possession of a working appliance just because you’ve bought one. We suggest you appeal to the store’s sense of customer service.
No. Scooters are designed for use on asphalt and concrete, not for off-road conditions. You are covered by the Act only if the goods are not fit for their ordinary purpose, or any proposed purpose you made known to the supplier prior to purchase, or if misrepresentations are made by the seller before the sale.
Return it and get a refund or replacement jersey, minus the owl. Goods must match the description or photograph shown in the catalogue. The company must also cover the cost of the return postage.
No. You can return a product only if it fails to live up to the guarantees in the Act. If you simply change your mind, then all you can do is tell the supplier and politely ask for your money back.
They are under no obligation to refund you, but some will, to promote good relations with customers. The money-back guarantee (with proof of purchase) offered by The Warehouse is well known, but there are many other stores that do the same. This exceeds the requirements of the Act.
No. Suppliers’ warranties are in addition to those in the Act. If you have used your washing machine in a normal fashion, it should not have a major breakdown after just 3 years, so you may still have redress under the CGA. The dealer should repair the machine free of charge.
Many shops regard this as unfair – after all, you’ve had 3 years’ good use out of the washer. But the fact is, you paid for a new machine and didn’t expect after just 3 years to face major costs or end up with an inferior one.
If they refuse to accept this, you could have the machine repaired elsewhere and attempt to recover the cost from the dealer.
The shop. In addition to replacing the heater with one suitable for bathroom use, they should reimburse you for the fire damage, because it was “reasonably foreseeable” that the fire might happen.
Unlikely. It was not reasonably foreseeable that the fire would cause you to miss your meeting.
Assuming the installation was not the cause of the problem, you have rights of redress against the manufacturer. You can claim the cost of repair or the loss of value.
You can also claim for the damage to the carpet as a “consequential loss”. If the installation was the cause of the problem see our advice about what to do about a Business collapse.
Possibly. The ordinary purpose of the appliance is domestic, so it should be covered. However, traders are allowed to “contract out” of the Act when they are selling goods or services for commercial use. If this happened, the cleaner would not be covered.
The fridge is yours to keep. The problem with the debt is the dealer’s to resolve. If you feel uncomfortable about this option, you could return the fridge to the dealer and demand a full cash refund.
Even though your boat is second-hand, it must be free from minor defects – unless the dealer told you about them before you bought the boat. Any known defects should be pointed out to you by the dealer, preferably in writing.
If the dealer didn’t do this, you should take it back. The dealer can then decide whether to repair the defect, or give you an identical replacement minus the rot, or take the boat back and give you a refund.
Yes. The Act says that in the case of a “failure of substantial character”, you (and not the dealer) get to choose what to do. You can demand that the dealer replaces the boat or refunds your money.
This would apply if: you wouldn’t have bought the boat if you’d known about the rot; if the boat is substantially unfit for the purpose for which it was supplied because of the rot; or if the boat is not of acceptable quality because it is unsafe.
You can ask - but the shopkeeper is under no obligation to refund you. She could argue that, bearing in mind what she told you at the time of sale, plus the age, condition and price paid, it was of “acceptable quality” under the Act.
No. The Act clearly states that a supplier includes a person who is acting “as an agent for another”.
Yes. From 17 June 2014 the Act covers goods sold at auction where the seller is a professional trader.
If you bought it from a private person you’re not covered. However, if you bought it from a person in trade, then the Act does cover you. Professional traders selling online must tell you they’re “in trade”.
Sorry, the Act does not cover private sales. However, if you can prove you were misled, you can demand your money back under common law. Take the guy to a Disputes Tribunal if he won’t play ball.
The Consumer Advice Line is available to all our members for support on any consumer-related issue. Our expert advisers can explain your rights and help you resolve problems with a retailer. Become a member now from just $9.95 and let us help you get a resolution.
Thanks for requesting to reset your password. We've sent you an email with instructions on what you need to do. If you haven't received the email within the next five minutes please call us on 0800 266 786.
Sorry, the information you are trying to access is available to paying members only. Your membership helps us deliver our services and advocate for a fair deal for all New Zealand consumers.
Not a member yet? Avoid expensive mistakes and join more than 80,000 other savvy consumers making smart decisions.