Join ConsumerLoginDonate
  • Consumer NZ
  • About us
  • Consumer rights and advice
  • Subscribe to our newsletters
  • Media releases
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Community guidelines
  • Contact us
  • Membership
  • Join
  • Membership support
  • Consumer magazine
  • Consumer Advice Line
  • Top tests and reviews
  • Other sites
  • Campaigns
  • Stop misleading supermarket pricing
  • Fix the broken electricity market
  • Sign the flight rights petition
  • Stamp out scams
  • Right to repair
  • End greenwashing now

Follow us

© Copyright Consumer NZ. All rights reserved.

Smartwatches: fancy features or better battery?

The more fully featured your fitness tracker is, the more often you have to recharge it.

September 2020
Nick gelling

By Nick Gelling

Product Test Journalist | Kaipūrongo Whakamātautau Hautaonga

Our latest test of smartwatches and fitness trackers shows that the more features and better tracking precision a wearable device has, the faster its battery drains. Is that a sacrifice you’re willing to make?

The Apple Watch Series 5 is the best-performing smartwatch in our test right now. It has an abundance of smart features, such as remote payment and voice calling, and its fitness functions have top-notch accuracy.

20sep apple watch series 5 1

Apple Watch Series 5

There’s one big problem, though – the battery doesn’t last. At all. While the average wearable in our test lasts 6-7 days on a charge, the Apple Watch could only manage 31 hours. That means, realistically, it needs to be charged daily.

In fact, our battery life test is conservative as it doesn’t include the use of advanced features, such as GPS. It tends to overestimate battery life compared to manufacturers’ claims, which assume intense use. Apple only claims an 18-hour recharge cycle for the Series 5.

Disappointingly, manufacturers of high-end smartwatches don’t seem to be trying to extend battery life. Apple released the Watch Series 6 and the cheaper Watch SE last week, and both carry the same 18-hour claim.

It’s not just Apple – the trend across our entire test is that functionality improves at the expense of battery life. The question becomes whether the benefits of those cutting-edge features outweigh the convenience of a week-long battery – and likely a longer overall lifespan, since batteries last for a finite number of charging cycles.


Our pick

20sep huawei gt 2e 1

Huawei GT 2e


If you want the best of both worlds, our pick is Huawei’s new GT 2e watch. It’s marginally less accurate than the Apple Watch (83% vs 84%), but it’s a lot cheaper and its battery lasted 12 days in our test. However, it does lack some fancy features including WiFi and NFC.


Sportswoman looking at smartwatch at gym.

Smartwatch reviews

In the market for a smartwatch or fitness tracker? We've tested 28 models.

Compare products



More from Consumer

Image of a woman wearing a fitness tracker

Smartwatch & fitness tracker reviews

Updated November 2025
Image of people using their mobile phones

Mobile phone reviews

Updated October 2025
Kids taking selfies in the ocean.

Water resistance: IP ratings explained

Updated 3 March 2025


Comments

Get access to comment
Join Consumer
Log in

Was this page helpful?