20aug power play hero
Research report
28 August 2020

Power play: is the electricity market delivering fair prices?

Overflowing hydro dams but spiking wholesale power prices. Is the electricity market broken?

The rain pelted down. It poured and poured, and then poured some more.

Moisture-laden air from the Tasman Sea slammed into the Southern Alps last December, forcing rain clouds to explode upwards and driving torrential rain on to the western slopes.

The rain spilled over into catchments east of the main divide, the water thundering down rivers and into hydro-generation lakes in the southern South Island and along the Waitaki and Clutha rivers.

Generators Meridian Energy and Contact Energy began spilling water to cope with the inflows but electricity prices on the spot market remained higher than might be expected, averaging around 15¢ a kilowatt hour (kWh, or “unit”). For about 10 years until 2018, the average spot price was around 7.5¢.

So if spot prices can stay high when there’s so much water, is the market broken?

Undesirable affairs

The December price spike led seven power retailers to complain about an alleged undesirable trading situation (UTS) to the Electricity Authority (EA), which was already reviewing wholesale prices.

The EA’s preliminary investigation found the behaviour of Contact and Genesis Energy, which the authority included as it was also spilling from its South Island lakes, wasn’t significant enough to be deemed a UTS. However, Meridian’s behaviour was “material enough”.

Meridian chief executive Neal Barclay said the company didn’t believe its actions constituted a UTS and has lodged a submission on the preliminary finding.

One thing’s for sure – there was a heck of a lot of rain in the South Island hydro catchments at the end of last year.

National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA) meteorologist Ben Noll said a pattern of persistent west and northwest winds across the South Island in November and December brought copious rain.

In November, the month’s highest one-day rainfall of 185mm was on the ninth at Milford Sound. The following month, Milford Sound took the honours again, with a 24-hour fall of 271mm on the second.

Manapōuri (West Arm Jetty) had its third wettest November on record, with 732mm, while Wanaka, Manapōuri Airport and Queenstown all observed their second wettest Decembers. Mount Cook Village, not too far away from the Waitaki hydro chain, recorded 1202mm of rain in December.

Mr Barclay said the early summer deluge forced the company to “spill from every hydro structure for the first time in Meridian’s history”.

“The floods were extreme and saw us reach maximum consented lake levels. Our catchments have limited storage, so when big weather events occur, spill is unavoidable.

“Over December 2019, we generated 1150 gigawatt hours (GWh) [of electricity] from our hydro stations, we spilt around 1300GWh, and the volume of spill we could have avoided, following the authority’s reasoning, is 12.2GWh or less than 0.5 percent of the water we had to deal with in December.”

Meridian generated more renewable electricity last December than in any previous December in its history, he said.

“Claims we should have generated more should be seen in this context. We were dealing with a record rainfall and flood event for which spill was inevitable and unavoidable. At such times, our focus is on the safety of people and structures downstream.”

The $80m question

The EA paints a different picture. It accepts some spilling was “necessary and acceptable” to ensure resource consent conditions were met. But it also states “the market outcomes in December, in our view, did not match our expectations of a power system with abundant cheap fuel”.

In his 30 June briefing, authority chief executive James Stevenson-Wallace said “generators spilled water in preference to lowering their offer prices” during the period 3 to 18 December.

He said evidence showed Meridian was pricing its power to ensure the high-voltage direct-current (HVDC) link (aka the Cook Strait cable) didn’t become constrained but the authority had made it clear price offers shouldn’t be used for that purpose.

“By doing this, Meridian kept the prices in the south higher than we would expect, given the abundance of fuel,” EA chief strategy officer James Tipping said.

The authority found at least 55 megawatts (MW) of excess spill in December could have been used for generation and 41GWh of extra energy could have been produced.

Water flowing out of hydro dam.

The financial impact was “difficult to determine” but the EA estimated an additional $80 million was paid by electricity retailers, although noted this wasn’t a measure of generators’ profits.

It also found more expensive thermal generation was forced to run in the North Island because South Island stations were spilling excess water, despite the HVDC not being at capacity.

Meridian doesn’t accept it caused an undesirable trading situation. Mr Barclay sees the EA’s preliminary decision as “the latest development in a complex and long-standing industry debate between the authority and generators” about managing price risks.

What about the difference between the authority’s estimate of 41GWh of lost generation and Meridian’s figure of 12.2GWh? Mr Barclay said that’s due to the company accounting for generating plant outages and using a different date range than the EA.

If it’s found the company didn’t carry out the spill “perfectly, given the challenging circumstances … it will not sit well with us”, he said.

What’s an “undesirable trading situation”?

A UTS, or "undesirable trading situation", is defined by the Electricity Industry Participation Code as an event “that threatens, or may threaten, confidence in, or the integrity of, the wholesale market" and can’t be resolved by any other mechanism in the code.

The Electricity Authority said UTS provisions exist because not all future eventualities in the market can be foreseen and not all can be protected against with specific rules.

The last UTS claim to be upheld was in March 2011, after spot prices rocketed to $19,750 per megawatt hour (MWh) north of Hamilton for several hours during a Transpower national grid upgrade. The authority required Genesis Energy to recalculate its spot prices for the period at no higher than $3000 per MWh.

Broken market?

For consumers, the spot price hike in December didn’t mean power bills shot up that month. Most households are on fixed-price power plans, which means they’re not directly exposed to the peaks and troughs of spot prices on the wholesale market.

However, what happens on the wholesale market inevitably affects what consumers pay.

Vocus NZ chief executive Mark Callander said consumers may not be exposed to the spot market but their retailers are and retailers need to “recover costs through prices to end-consumers”.

Vocus, which owns power and telco retailer Slingshot, was one of the seven retailers to lodge a complaint to the EA about the December 2019 events. It estimated an extra 6000 tonnes of carbon dioxide was emitted from thermal power plants as a result of water being spilled.

Flick Energy, which offers domestic power plans based on spot price tariffs, also put its name to the complaint. Chief executive Steve O’Connor believes there’s a bigger issue with the wholesale market and said the company’s been concerned for two years that prices don’t reflect costs.

“If the EA doesn’t look at the bigger picture, consumers will suffer in the long term through more behaviour like this.”

Electrical engineer and energy specialist Bryan Leyland described the spilling as “a bit blatant”.

“Somebody needs to stand back and ask: ‘What is the best way of managing our electricity industry in the country’s interests?’

“If you’ve got high prices and you’re spilling instead of generating, clearly the market is broken.”

Energy and Resources Minister Megan Woods didn’t want to comment on the state of the market before the EA’s final decision.

That decision is expected in October. If it upholds the initial ruling, more consultation will follow on what actions might be taken against Meridian.

However, preventing the situation happening again is likely to require bigger changes. Without better regulation of the sector, there’s little to stop more water being spilt next time the rain buckets down.

The purpose of electricity regulation should be to ensure consumers can buy power at a fair price and it’s produced sustainably. Spilling when cheap power can be generated means that’s not happening.

Flicking the Tiwai switch

On a bleak Southland day, it’s an eerie sight to see huge power pylons marching across swampy coastal wetlands, carrying gargantuan amounts of electricity into the mist to the Tiwai Point aluminium smelter.

The New Zealand Aluminium Smelters (NZAS) plant uses about 13 percent of New Zealand’s electricity and can draw up to 572 megawatts (MW) of power, generated by Meridian Energy’s Manapōuri hydro station, from the grid at any time.

How much NZAS’s owners – Rio Tinto and Sumitomo – pay for its electricity has always been a carefully guarded secret but industry sources say it’s about 5¢ per unit (or kilowatt hour). That’s between one-fifth and one-sixth the price per unit the average householder pays.

If the owners make good on their latest threat to turn off the potlines by August 2021, there will be a lot more electricity sloshing about. But getting it from the far south to the rest of the country will require upgrading the grid.

Before NZAS announced it was closing the plant, national grid operator Transpower was already working on the problem of getting extra electricity out of the South Island and through the HVDC link across the Cook Strait, with a completion date of winter 2023.

A spokesperson for Energy and Resources Minister Megan Woods said the government agreed to fast-track that work as part of its Covid-19 response, although progress depends on favourable winter weather allowing complex rewiring to take place.

At present, not all the excess electricity from the deep south can be transferred further north, and potentially to the North Island via the HVDC link, because line capacity is limited around Roxburgh.

“Expanding the grid will enable much greater export of Manapōuri and other potential Southland renewable generation,” a spokesperson for Dr Woods said.

Transpower general counsel and company secretary David Knight said work on the $97 million Clutha-Upper Waitaki Lines Project began last December.

“This project is an upgrade of capacity on existing circuits to enable them to transport more power, including that currently supplied to Tiwai, from the bottom of the South Island northwards from Roxburgh into the Waitaki Valley.

“It will increase the amount of generation to be transmitted to the North Island via the HVDC system, and to the upper South Island.”

Transpower wouldn’t predict the effect this would have on individual householders’ power bills but has estimated a $100 million per year benefit from avoided spill of low-cost renewable generation.

Meridian chief executive Neal Barclay said “on that estimate, the benefits to consumers exceed the cost of the lines project in less than one year”.

Industry expert Bryan Leyland points out the smelter usually uses 572MW, 24 hours a day, including during the early hours of the morning when other demand is low.

“It’s pretty hard to find another load that could use that much early in the morning. And there’s a considerable chance that even after the upgrades, there will be surplus hydro-power capacity available when it’s wet.”

Contact Energy spokesman Paul Ford agrees spilling will become more frequent should the smelter close before transmission upgrades are complete.

“That means that between August 2021 and winter 2023, a significant amount of the water currently being used by Contact to generate renewable energy via the Clyde and Roxburgh dams will, in large part, end up flowing down the Clutha River.”


Could your next power bill be smaller?

Powerswitch is the free, independent way to check your power plan, and see if you could save - backed by Consumer NZ. So why pay more than you need to? Check in just 3 minutes - and make sure you know the deal.

See what you could save

Member comments

Get access to comment

Mark H.
01 Sep 2020
The current system is not totally broken but it has some fundamental flaws

I agree that the current market is broken if our goal is to produce the lowest price for all of New Zealand. It is also broken if reducing carbon emissions is our goal.

But I do not think that it was all rosy before corporatisation and privatisation. I remember the power cuts and shortages when the engineers were in charge. I also remember the lack of maintenance when money was short. Neither could be totally blamed on the engineers but that system was also quite broken too. Prices didn't reflect true costs and there were only day-night tariffs to signal peak costs to residential users.

I am not complaining about the prices I pay because I'm not suffering from my electricity prices increasing faster than inflation since corporatisation in 1987. Since 1993 I have lived in the same house and my calculated price for 1,200kWh a month (14,400kWh a year) have only increased at a slightly higher rate than general inflation. That also includes the GST increases from 10% to 15%. Incidentally, that also included an eye-watering 25% increase between 1992 and 1993.

My main issue with the current regime is that it encourages profit seeking at the expense of most New Zealanders. It does encourage retail innovation but it totally fails to support that because pricing signals that could change the consumption profile are being manipulated by the generators for what I would call excessive profit.

We are also afflicted by several issues others have already mentioned:
* most production in the South Island and most consumption in the North Island.
* generators are able to increase profits at the expense of consumers and the goals of reducing prices and reducing emissions.
* the incumbent government always has moral hazard because they benefit from increased profits in the electricity industry.
* recent governments have also had conflicting internal goals around energy production and consumption e.g. some government parties wanting no new hydro sites and others wanting more.
* the operational system appears to have developed during times of ever-increasing consumption whereas now overall consumption is rather flat. Yet peak consumption continues to rise which increases the opportunities for generators to manipulate prices for profit.

Gillian T.
17 Apr 2021
Why are we paying 4x what the Aussies are?

Here are some facts for the historically-challenged:

- our electricity sector was a brilliantly conceived and managed energy system
- built in THE most hostile, physical and topographical environment
- representatives from around the world came to see how we pulled it off - those clueless engineers obviously didn't know what they were doing!
- plans to bring rainwater from the West Coast, where it drains straight into the sea, to Canterbury, were shelved.
- I could go on...

It wasn't perfect but it was a damned sight better than what we have now. Why was it so successful? Holistic management, long-term data collection and planning. Most importantly, because the people who ran it had a stake in it - the people of New Zealand.

The Rogernomes totally destroyed intelligent development in this country.

Steve S.
31 Aug 2020
Bring back the engineers

Remember the good old days when NZED (NZ Electricity Department) supplied our power? The NZED was staffed by engineers who knew how to plan, manage infrastructure, and deliver power to consumers and businesses at a fair and equitable cost.

Then Rogernomics and the Bradford reforms happened. It will result in cheaper power, they said. Perfect for a Tui's ad. Now we have multiple retailers and gentailers staffed with corporate execs, marketers, accountants and lawyers, with hardly an engineer in sight. Profit is the motive, not low cost to consumers.

Yes the market is fundamentally broken, and needs to be reformed. But it's more than getting Manapouri power onto the backbone grid. As consumers we pay a surcharge on the marginal generation cost, which is always high as it's supplied by thermal power stations. Meanwhile, the hydro generators are making a killing as their generation cost from hydro assets is low.

But don't expect changes any time soon. They're an effective lobby group, and the Government gets paid big dividends as they're part owners. It's also why you're not seeing subsidies for solar power installations - like excess power from Manapouri, it would drive the marginal cost down. Great for all consumers, but at the expense of profit and dividends.

I'd love to see engineers put back in charge. Let's think about our climate change responsibilities, increasing use of EVs, localised solar and delivering power at a fair cost, without the bloated corporates gouging us.

Graeme W.
24 Feb 2021
The situation was worse prior to deregulation (just hidden)

Prior to dereg, hydro stations were developed that will NEVER in their lifetimes pay for themselves, they had long run marginal costs of 15-21c/kWh (against a current wholesale price of 10c/kWh and a wholesale price before deregulation of 3c/kWh). Of course hardly anyone knows this because its buried in some documents that probably no longer exist; consumers never paid the true cost because it was massively subsidised by taxpayers.

At least this would never happen in the commercial environment we have now.

31 Aug 2020
Electricity Market Rort

The electricity market needs to be turned upside down and completely reformed to serve the people and industry in New Zealand.

Tiwai has never been subsidised just overcharged compared to the cost of production which for Manapouri is less than one cent a unit.

New Zealand consumers are paying between 25 to 43 cents a unit plus line charges. Hydro power is charged out at the dearest cost of generation which is wind.
Electricity is an essential utility and charges should be fair and reasonable not the rort we currently have.
Spending millions to transmit power north is a travesty. If power was charged for on cost plus 10 you would attract industry to areas where it is generated just like what attracted Tiwai to be built in the first place.

Gerard H.
31 Aug 2020
Generators and lines companies should be in public ownership

This was a disgrace - but predictable. Headline could have been "Large corporation puts profits ahead of customers and the environment". What a shock. We need an integrated generation system that is owned and run on behalf of the people who actually paid for it and built in the first place - the public of New Zealand. The lines companies are the same and are natural monopolies. Retailing can remain competitive but having large generators retailing and generating is a huge mistake. An integrated system would put us in a much better position to ensure cheap renewable energy is available at in the future.

Jonathan C.
29 Aug 2020
Thanks Max

Once upon a time generation and supply was managed for the good of the country. Then a certain government parted it out claiming that privatization and competition would result in cheaper power. It hasn't worked.

Brian W.
29 Aug 2020
electricity production

It is not the market that is broken, it is the obsession with 'green energy' - expensive and unreliable it is

Donna T.
29 Aug 2020
Just Make It Fair

The major portion of our power bill is lines charges. We in Northland are paying 43c/kWh, the highest in the country. When I have enquired it is because of the maintenance costs of the transmission lines apparently and that we do not have centres with high populations (read competition). The irony is the Ngawha plant near Kaikohe produces more than the demand for the whole of Northland. So who is telling porkies here? The less well off families up here simply have to go without, leading to bigger issues e.g health so isn't this really just about more corporate greed? Farcical and shameful.

Robin B.
29 Aug 2020
Delivery costs

I have Greypower electricity, about 60% of our electricity's final account is delivery, meters, etc. I still believe our electricity was broken when it was privatized to produce "competition". We now have many COs in the electricity companies on multi-million contracts plus bonuses. Our actual energy account $104, is only a fraction of the final account with delivery being $158, then GST is added

Patrick M.
29 Aug 2020
Green New Deal

Problem with Electricity is that the government suffers "Provider Capture" from the Big retailers and "Gentailers". Much better to put Solar on every roof and wind in every city and the grid would only be a backup and the consumer would not be at the mercy of the provider as at present. Read Jeremy Rifkin "the Green New Deal", it is happening in Europe Africa and, believe it or not, some US cities. It only requires a new way of thinking not the old" Neoliberal Provider/ Consumer trap!"

Zarir C.
29 Aug 2020
Head in the sand

I no, not the right place and time to put this out. Northland and North Island are both suited for small nuclear power plants. Energy generated by small nuclear plants removes the losses by way of transport, gives control of production at short notice and is not dependent on the vagaries of nature. California is a good example for small units and so are France and India for large units.

24 Jul 2021


Chris O.
02 Apr 2022

The elephant in the room regarding nuclear power; we still have no way of dealing to nuclear waste. We were told in the sixties that they were working on it, and a solution would soon be found. Also that the power would be so cheap as to not be worth metering. And that nothing could possibly go wrong. None of which have eventuated. My solar panels just go on giving with NO maintenance or other issues. Need I say more?

Amanda E.
29 Aug 2020
Short circuiting electricity

The whole system broke when electricity became viewed as a profitable commodity instead of a utility. Privatisation of the whole thing was a joke and I fail to see how it will get better soon. No idea how it will be paid for without Tiwai input. I assume us ordinary people will just have to go cold and where will that leave the generators, retailers and lines companies?