What are your rights when buying things in an online auction?
What are your rights when buying things in an online auction?
Trade Me deals gone wrong are keeping the Disputes Tribunal busy.
The Trade Me listing claimed the van “drives like new and all in very good condition.” But the Disputes Tribunal had a different view, describing the 1994 Isuzu campervan as a “dog”.
The successful bidder paid $21,000 for the Isuzu and needed to spend another $15,000 to get it back on the road. When this dog of a van had its day in court, the tribunal referee found the seller had deliberately misrepresented its condition. The buyer was awarded $11,000 in damages – the difference between the price paid and the tribunal’s generous estimate of the van’s actual worth.
Trade Me deals gone pear-shaped are providing steady work for tribunals around the country. Not surprisingly, “misrepresentation” of the goods is a major cause of disputes. That campervan, car or Playstation alleged to be in mint condition turns out to be anything but.
If you bought the goods from a shop, you’d have the Consumer Guarantees Act (CGA) and Fair Trading Act (FTA) to fall back on. But Trade Me deals struck between private individuals aren’t covered by these Acts.
When a deal with another private individual turns sour, you have to rely on laws other than the CGA to see you right.
If a seller claims a product is in "top working order" but you're sold a dog, the Contract and Commercial Law Act may help. This Act says that if the seller misrepresents the product and you're persuaded to buy it because of that misrepresentation, you can claim damages. If the misrepresentation leaves you seriously out of pocket, you have the right to cancel the deal.
Case study: the $11,000 campervan
A Toyota HiAce campervan was listed on Trade Me as "in perfect mechanical condition". The van sold for $11,000 but the buyer subsequently discovered it had an illegal warrant of fitness, uncertified modifications and needed $16,000 of repairs. The Disputes Tribunal held the seller had misrepresented the van's condition and the buyer was entitled to cancel the contract. The seller was ordered to repay the $11,000 and collect the van at his own expense.
To succeed in a claim under the Contract and Commercial Law Act, you have to do more than just prove the seller misrepresented the product. You also have to show the misrepresentation influenced you to make the purchase. The misrepresentation doesn't have to be the only factor you relied on – but it does have to be a significant one.
Case study: the $1500 car
A 1990 Honda CRX sold on Trade Me for $1500. The car subsequently failed to get a warrant and the buyer wanted to cancel the contract. Although the Disputes Tribunal found it was "more probable than not" that the seller had misrepresented the vehicle's condition, the buyer wasn't entitled to cancel. He had viewed the car on 2 separate occasions before buying and knew the vehicle had failed its last WOF inspection. As a result, the tribunal wasn't persuaded the seller's claims had induced the buyer to purchase and his case failed.
The Contract and Commercial Law Act also allows you to claim for damages if you've forked out for repairs on your purchase. But there are limits. The law says you have a duty to minimise your losses – so your claim's not likely to succeed if you've continued to repair some item with major faults.
Case study: the $6100 boat
The buyer of a second-hand boat went to the Disputes Tribunal claiming $7200 in repair costs. He'd paid $6100 for the boat, listed on Trade Me as in "excellent condition". The engine failed soon after the boat was delivered and required a series of major repairs. The tribunal was only prepared to award the buyer $1150 to cover the costs of the initial repairs. It held the buyer shouldn't have proceeded with the subsequent repairs when the costs became apparent.
The Contract and Commercial Law Act may also provide some comeback if you've bought a product that doesn't match its description. The Act says where goods are "sold by description" then they must correspond with that description. If they don't, you can reject them. "Description" usually means a statement about the kind or class of the good, rather than its condition or quality.
Case study: the $5500 motorbikes
2 Triumph motorbikes were sold on Trade Me for $5150. The buyer later discovered some of the parts were from a different make of bike (a Yamaha) and other parts were missing. The tribunal held the bikes didn't correspond with the description of a Triumph motorbike and ordered the seller to repay the $5150. The buyer was required to return the bikes once payment had been made.
The Contract and Commercial Law Act also gives you the right to keep the goods but claim damages for any financial loss resulting from the inaccurate description. The hitch is sellers can contract out of these provisions of the Act – and if they do, these rights won't apply.
If the Trade Me seller is a professional trader your rights are different.
Law changes that took effect from 17 June 2014 require professional traders selling on internet sites to tell you they’re “in trade” so you know who you’re dealing with. Goods you buy online from a professional trader will be covered by the Consumer Guarantees Act (CGA) and the Fair Trading Act (FTA).
The CGA requires goods to be of acceptable quality and fit for purpose. You may have grounds for a claim against a trader if they’re not. See Consumer Guarantees Act for more information.
You’ll also have grounds for a claim if the trader has misled you. The FTA prohibits traders from making false or misleading claims about the goods they sell. See Fair Trading Act for more.
Trade Me says most of the 12.5 million transactions that take place through its site each year complete with no problems. But that's not always the case. During 2010, Trade Me figures show that 439 sales resulted in Disputes Tribunal claims.
If you do end up with goods that fall well short of what was advertised, try to sort things out with the seller first. If that fails, your next step is usually the Disputes Tribunal. The tribunal can only hear claims up to $15,000 (or $20,000 with the agreement of both parties).
If you've bought a car from a motor vehicle dealer, you can take your case to the Motor Vehicle Disputes Tribunal. It can hear claims up to $100,000.
Whichever tribunal you appear before, you’ll need to be prepared:
If a shady seller dupes you, let Trade Me know. The site's terms and conditions require sellers to enter listings that are "accurate, current, complete and include all relevant information". Trade Me says around 140 members are banned each month for breaching this condition.
Trade Me has also developed a protocol with the Disputes Tribunal to assist people who want to bring a claim. It provides court registrars with a statutory declaration that claimants complete. When the declaration is filled out, Trade Me will release its formal record of the deal.
If you take a case to the tribunal and win, that's not always the end of the matter. The seller may not pay and you'll have to chase-up payment. You can request enforcement of a Disputes Tribunal order by the courts. This can be a lengthy process and it could well be some time before you get the money that's owed you.
Buying goods online, sight unseen, involves a big element of trust. You trust the seller is genuine – and they take a leap of faith you’ll pay up. But there are safeguards you can take to minimise the risk of something going wrong.
Before you buy:
A $4300 jet ski listed on Trade Me as in "top condition" broke down the day after purchase. The Disputes Tribunal ordered the seller to pay the buyer $4400 in damages to compensate him for the amount spent repairing the ski.
A PS3 player listed as being still under warranty sold for $500. When the buyer received the machine, it didn't work and he found the warranty was no longer valid. The tribunal ordered the seller to repay the $500 plus freight.
A 1995 Toyota Toyace listed as having done 190,000km sold on Trade Me for $6000. The buyer found the truck's actual mileage was 285,000km. The tribunal ordered the seller to pay damages of $1500, the difference between the purchase price and the truck's estimated value.